This is a very good essay and I would give a green rating but I would like a more well defined explanation about Socialism because there is usually confusion of idealogy of which is what.
- 12/06/2006
- 00:49:12
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Your essay is very detailed and contains many point of views. I would, though, like to see the skeptic's side. I hope you are aware though that if you try to reduce any of the gases above they always have consequences. For example, if CFC's are banned a cheap refrigerant would be gone for the third world population. Thus the consequences of this is an increase of food poisoning deaths. I would also like to note how a real greenhouse works. An actual greenhouse works because it is a barrier to convection while in reality the atmosphere allows convection. This is a common misunderstanding and I hope you value my opinion.
- 29/04/2006
- 06:30:33
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I may be a year 9 but I agree with you wholly that without DDT malaria is endemic. I do not agree though that DDT is toxic in any way because the person who banned DDT actually gave a good opinion of it.
- 28/04/2006
- 03:53:34
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
You should state your sources and especially from reliable ones because the audience or readers may not know the truth.
- 27/04/2006
- 05:32:44
- Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
It's a very good essay, I wish to see more detail and more depth
- 10/02/2006
- 05:47:18
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.