User Details For: helpdesk

Essay List

No Essays.


Comments List
  • Not an essay

    Not even concise notes.This is just a list, people.
    • 12/06/2005
    • 05:39:57
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • You ask. . .

    "Who wouldn't want the ability to transform their car into a jet-powered boat at the touch of a button?"Answer: Anyone who lives nowhere near water.Duh.
    • 29/04/2005
    • 05:36:03
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ignorant

    You know very little about the actual facts of your topic.Much misinformation.
    • 20/04/2005
    • 05:41:10
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Mediocre, really

    second sentence "Drug use is the increasing problem among teenagers today." doesn't even make sense.
    • 20/04/2005
    • 05:22:57
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Hope you\'re not thinking about being an English teacher. . .

    Grammar is atrocious.
    • 30/03/2005
    • 04:55:42
    • Score: 1 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Pick a tense, any tense. . .

    but don't mix past and present. Be consistent.
    • 30/03/2005
    • 04:53:07
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • ALWAYS

    Spell out an acronym at first reference!
    • 25/03/2005
    • 16:59:04
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • You write:

    "Pollution now is a very important problem"-- do you mean to imply that it wasn't a very important problem 5 years ago? 10 years ago? In some areas, hasn't the problem of pollution improved over time, such as auto emissions, disposal of hazardous waste, decline in use of ozone-destroying chemicals such as CFCs and so forth?Research: it's a good thing.
    • 24/03/2005
    • 19:02:24
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • A couple of very recent sources

    would go a long way toward credibility.This paper could have been written four years ago. Computer simulations, advancements in treatment of lab animals. . . has nothing changed since 2001?
    • 24/03/2005
    • 18:58:51
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • OMG!!!

    The sky is falling! The sky is falling!Lots of hype, barely any useful information at all.
    • 24/03/2005
    • 18:54:27
    • Score: 1 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Yet another annoyingly vague title

    That could easily be more specific and add much needed focus to the essay.
    • 24/03/2005
    • 18:52:04
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Logical fallacies abound

    Your agenda is clear. Your argument is weak.
    • 24/03/2005
    • 00:15:59
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • You imply

    that the themes of parental obligation and religion are discussed during the 2nd act.Since this is the introduction to your essay as well as the first sentence, more care should be takento ensure clarity.Torvald is strict about the breeding of his children?
    • 24/03/2005
    • 00:12:08
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Bad title

    Your title indicts all of Hollywood while the essay discusses only 2 films.
    • 24/03/2005
    • 00:04:22
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • You asked...

    My question would be: Did you intend to prohibit praying or the utterance of God's name in our public schools or public gatherings?The answer: Yes. That was the intent.Uttering "god" may represent freedom for those who believe in a god-centered religion.Doesn't do much for non-believers or members of other faiths.
    • 23/03/2005
    • 01:12:33
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • All sources are outdated

    why?
    • 22/03/2005
    • 02:26:47
    • Score: 6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
  • Newsflash

    Auschwitz is still recognized for hatred and death.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 19:30:51
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Huh?

    "violent and racist hatred of whites towards black people" Doesn't make sense.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 19:20:46
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Lose! The! Exclamation! Points!!!!

    !!!
    • 21/03/2005
    • 19:18:01
    • Score: 1 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Full of misinformation

    You obviously are unaware of laws currently in place. You know nothing about firearms and self defense, and your 4th paragraph contradicts your thesis entirely.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 19:07:36
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Misleading title

    interesting analysis, though.(yeah, basically repeating the other comment)
    • 21/03/2005
    • 18:54:44
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Somewhere in this mess...

    ...is probably a good paper.Get rid of the outline, the methodology, the outdated sources and other irrelevant commentary and you might just have something here.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 18:47:46
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • 2 Different Movies

    The Terminator -- 1984Terminator 2: Judgment Day -- 1991(Also, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines -- 2003)
    • 21/03/2005
    • 18:40:43
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7e.html

    . . .
    • 21/03/2005
    • 18:13:31
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Hell, indeed

    Your second sentence states "as I said" but you did not say *anything* yet, and more of nothing is said throughout.And even if something worthwhile was said, there is never a need to say "as I said" because, as you said, you already SAID IT.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 04:10:27
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • D

    Super crummy introduction: "In this novel called Wuthering Heights written by Emily Bronte there is a character named Heathcliff." Gah.The character Heathcliff in Emily Bronte's _Wuthering Heights_ is viewed as a victim because_______ <--and no, "childhood, etc." is not acceptable.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 04:01:04
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Why no recent sources?

    Hint: A study published 5 years ago is not recent.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 03:49:15
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Here's a thought

    How about an INTRODUCTION and a THESIS STATEMENT? Or, are we just supposed to GUESS wtf you are writing about? Oh, and please, could you make the title more vague? Thanks.
    • 21/03/2005
    • 03:45:05
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Already plagiarised

    http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=9752
    • 20/03/2005
    • 22:55:29
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent!

    An insightful analysis.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 22:46:55
    • Score: 0 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Did you read the book?

    You seem to miss the entire point of the novel.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 22:41:59
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Could this be any

    sloppier?
    • 20/03/2005
    • 07:29:55
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Too much

    "believing" in the first paragraph but it gets better after that.Would be much stronger if "I believe" was removed completely.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 07:24:15
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Sources

    Why so many outdated sources?Otherwise, a decent essay.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 07:07:28
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Useless

    Garbage.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 06:52:30
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • Huh?

    There's like, a whole paragraph or more missing, So it doesn't make any sense.Second paragraph starts: "In the case presented" -- but there is no case presented.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 06:46:05
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Not an essay

    I don't See where it says that notes are an acceptable substitutefor actually writing something coherent.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 06:38:18
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • This could be much better

    But it lacks an overall organizational structure or purpose and instead drones on endlessly. Points are listed one after another after another after another after another with zero analysis.
    • 20/03/2005
    • 06:20:43
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Odd

    Although very similar to your other essay on the same topic, you seem to contradict yourself.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:58:31
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Sources?

    Or were you born knowing all this?
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:53:04
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Too. Many. Typos.

    Very tedious reading.Also:"The growth of the economy and stock market increased the job opportunities as well as morals"The word you are looking for is *morale* -- morals makes no sense in that sentence.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:51:31
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Hmmm

    Suspiciously well written.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:41:17
    • Score: 1 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • "friend" eh?

    Annoying contrivance.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:19:39
    • Score: 0 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Recent sources?

    Obviously the stuff from Freud will be old. No excuse for the others. Do you think no research has been done since 1995 -- or is that when this paper was actually written (by someone other than yourself)?
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:15:41
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Is this a test?

    Way too many questions! Answer them-don't ask them!Spell out acronyms on first reference. FDI, PVD, MNE etc.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:09:13
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Assume the reader is *not* stupid

    Too much repetition for a short, lousy 5 paragraph essay."A great female writer of the time, Abigail Adams, wife of John Adams... ""woman by the name of Abigail Adams, husband [sic] of our second President, John Adams"
    • 19/03/2005
    • 18:02:48
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Repetive

    Ideas are repeated instead of developed.Awkward.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 07:13:53
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Too many quotes

    One would think the writer has no thoughts of his or her own.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 07:05:18
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • This story is crap and has no point.

    this story is crap and has no point.
    • 19/03/2005
    • 06:52:59
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Good start. . .

    . . .needs more development.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 22:05:37
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Is this an issue, really?

    "Since 1789, over 10,000 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed in Congress. Of those, only 33 were sent to the states for ratification, and only 27 were ultimately ratified."Source: http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly54.asp
    • 18/03/2005
    • 21:04:19
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Context?

    1. virtualvin.com no longer exists2. Much of the research above relies on sources from the mid 1990s3. eCommerce is no longer new, therefore this statement: "The advent of the Internet and electronic commerce (e-commerce) provide interesting new choices to industries and businesses. . ." is ridiculous.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:56:42
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • What grammar problem, exactly, needs to be fixed?

    It's frightening when the cheathouse cheaterz can't distinguish proper grammar from bad grammar.Hint: Formatting is not grammar.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:40:34
    • Score: 1 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • That funny thing in your door? It's a lock.

    Think about it.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:27:59
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Hint, the year is now 2005

    Interesting historical analysis of studies that took place in 1964, but please indicate the relevance to current research methods.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:20:50
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Oh, goody!

    "We now know and understand the power of knowledge and science in our lives."So, that's it, then?Just because technology makes YOU lazy, don't assume that is true for everyone!
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:17:10
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Just add logic. Oh, and proofread.

    As the father of scientific management which focus on improving work methods, tools and performance standard, Frederick Winslow Taylor believes that the employees should be motivated by obtains highest possible wages through working in most efficient/ productive way or the incentives will motivate employees to be more effectively.????Also: To get the best of the staff, we need to understand our staff, most of them do not need economical incentives to make them motivate to work, and they just need to know that the manager is happy with the performance of the staff.Ya think?
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:14:32
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • No! Exclamation! Point! Necessary!

    !!!!
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:09:51
    • Score: 1 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • A collection of non sequiturs

    What, exactly, is the point here?By the way, it's called "groupthink" and it's *not*a good thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
    • 18/03/2005
    • 20:02:36
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • One "rapper" is not "Rap music"

    Why not title this ignorant little rant "Eminem's Music and Children"?And why would responsible adults not monitor what their precious children listen to?Blah.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:54:29
    • Score: 0 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Huh?

    You said: ". . the government deserves better."What about the people????
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:50:56
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Uh, no.

    You say: There is no difference between the violence on the television or in real life.Try reality, it's a good thing. In reality, it is clear that the difference between violence in real life and violience on television is that violence on television is NOT REAL. Pretty big difference, eh?
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:38:43
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Black helicopters, anyone?

    Overly simplistic and lacking logic.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:32:52
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Research means. . .

    . . . that there has to be actual EVIDENCE of research.Yet, magically, there are NO SOURCES in this essay. Information is cited, but it comes from nowhere???Plagiarised essay on a plagiarism website. Imagine that.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:15:59
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • Huh?

    This sentence has no meaning:A story, Generation X, people who were born in the late sixties/early seventies, represent much of the attitudes towards the world today.WTF???
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:13:54
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Inadequate research

    Single sources are relied upon to support author's viewpoint suggesting that sources with opposing viewpoints were ignored. Lack of bibliography is troubling. Are sources recent?Proofreading is needed. Errors in the title are unacceptable.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:06:26
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Highly unlikely. . .

    . . .that this is your original work.
    • 18/03/2005
    • 19:02:00
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Could this be any more repetitious?

    Another form of symbolism, another form of symbolism, another form of symbolism YAWN.
    • 08/10/2004
    • 03:09:46
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Made up

    your example "while researching on [sic] sex education..." is not cited. Sounds like you made it up.
    • 08/10/2004
    • 03:05:22
    • Score: 1 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
  • Adjective abuse

    'nuff said
    • 08/10/2004
    • 02:55:03
    • Score: 2 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • Good start

    Your idea is a good one to begin with, but then it kind of goes nowhere. Bible, no need to save that--anyone who's interested already knows it well enough to tell anyone else who cares. History is very subjective--you would need to select a specific history book and then defend your selection. A history of the south and a history of the north in the US alone would be two completely different books. And if you feel the US government is untruthful, well, have you experienced any other governments that are better??Finally, the only "real" book you mention you don't even bother to capitalize the title. Seems like you probably need to read more.
    • 03/04/2004
    • 03:23:09
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Ludicrous

    "Due to the numourous sources I do not have a bibliography."Do you realize that the above reason is precisely why you should have a bibliography?Stupid stupid stupid.Idiotic.
    • 10/03/2004
    • 03:18:14
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • You didn't bother with any details like RESEARCH did you?

    The appeals process is far and away more costly than life imprisonment.There is no reliable evidence that the death penalty is a deterrent.Next time do some homework and collect a fact or two.
    • 21/02/2004
    • 05:53:11
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Ridiculous

    All this crap about learning styles and not one word explaining what they are. Here's a hint-learning styles: not rocket science and nowhere near the level of importance indicated in this overblown essay.
    • 21/02/2004
    • 05:46:00
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • There is a total lack of logic in this argument

    Guess what--evil is not necessary for good to occur.Your teacher who liked this must be an idiot.
    • 20/02/2004
    • 03:21:32
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Hate and ignorance

    You've demonstrated that you write poorly and can barely express the hate and ignorance that blinds your ability to approach this topic maturely.
    • 06/02/2004
    • 00:59:50
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • On what planet????

    You write: "Almost everyone follows the American styles of clothing. We also all, for the most part, eat all of the same foods and behave in the same ways."This is true on television. Hint: "The OC" is not the real world. We don't all eat the same foods. What is "American styles of clothing"?????
    • 06/02/2004
    • 00:52:38
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • You write...

    "The SUV phenomenon says a lot about American culture especially when we notice other countries haven't fallen prey to their charms." Well, I'm not sure what countries you've "noticed" but you may want to take another look. Be sure to look at only the highest income levels. Imagine what you'll find...
    • 30/01/2004
    • 05:15:40
    • Score: 3 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • R-r-r-i-i-i-g-g-h-h-t

    And that's why there's no teen violence in Japan. No teens there ever play violent video games.
    • 24/01/2004
    • 22:00:08
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Idiotic and sloppy

    for one thing, proofread.for another thing, persuasive essays should appeal to logic, not emotion. Since that is fact, it renders the rest of your "argument" irrelevant, doesn't it?As for 30 year old skateboarders, the name Tony Hawk comes to mind.
    • 24/01/2004
    • 21:48:38
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Being a doctor isn't only about chemistry

    I don't want a doctor who does not excel at math and English.
    • 13/01/2004
    • 19:34:48
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Uh, not an essay?

    Probably you need a blog.
    • 13/01/2004
    • 06:06:55
    • Score: 6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
  • Nothing personal, but...

    The answser is plain and clear. Stop writing about this topic. Everyone! It's boring, there's nothing new, your teachers don't want to read it and the world will not be a better place for your having written it.
    • 11/01/2004
    • 00:26:30
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent!

    The best essay I've read on this site so far. In fact, a great essay in general. Very informative, very helpful. Should be required reading for anyone who searches the web. So much useful info.Great work.I'd give this an A.Only small, small, change: first paragraph change proportion to either portion or percent.
    • 11/01/2004
    • 00:22:51
    • Score: 11 out of 11 people found this comment useful.
  • "apathy"

    Why is "apathy" in quotes throughout? Apathy is apathy. Nothing ironic or foriegn about the usage of this word in your essay.Also, isn't it obvious why voter turnout is higher in presidential election years? The interesting part of this essay, if true, is the decline in voter turnout--focus the whole essay on that and you'll have a winner.
    • 11/01/2004
    • 00:13:18
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Dog truths

    The author raises many important points about the responsibility of dog ownership. I wish there would have been more of an emphasis on the joys of rescuing a shelter dog, but that's just my own point of view. This essay is solid.
    • 07/01/2004
    • 03:44:44
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Nicely done

    Not bad at all. One huge suggestion: make this essay gender neutral. There is such a thing as a female hero or heroine (not heroin) but to read this essay one would think that to be a hero a character must be male. Yikes. Otherwise, I really liked this.
    • 31/12/2003
    • 08:46:09
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Fun.

    Although the protagonists downfall is predictable, there is a nice twist at the end. This writer has talent and style. Just add better proofreading! Oh, and tense agreement and stuff like that. But mostly plain old proofreading. Keep up the good work!
    • 31/12/2003
    • 08:37:49
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Interesting and well thought out,

    Well developed (for a summary). Am not impressed, however, by use Greenhaven Press Opposing Viewpoints as a source. This series is basically a secondary source that oversimplifies issues by gathering information from primary sources and dumbing it down. Use Opposing Viewpoints only for their bibliographies then go to the original sources. You\'l feel smarter for doing so.
    • 31/12/2003
    • 08:20:08
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Needs work...

    Lacks logic. Because the media arrives after a crime takes place the media is responsible for the crime. That's like saying cardiologists are responsible for heart attacks. Absurd. And what about some real examples?
    • 31/12/2003
    • 08:10:49
    • Score: 6 out of 7 people found this comment useful.